Seriously Disturbing Serial Killers from Around the World. I watch a lot of scary movies. Vampires, werewolves, zombies… they’ve got nothing on one other group when it comes to scaring me — serial killers. Even when they’re just fictional characters, I find serial killers to be terrifying not because I expect to come across one any more than a movie monster, but because they represent something real. These awful excuses for human beings do exist, and they pose a real threat to society. They come in all shapes and sizes, colors, and races. Today we’ll take a quick look at 2. There will be some of the more well- known U.
S. and other serial killers, but we’ll also have some from places like Russia, Indonesia, Mexico, China, and more. They aren’t all the most famous serial killers. You’ve probably never heard of some of them. And some of your “favorites” won’t be included here. This list is a little different.
Rather than focusing solely on well- known serial killers (although some will be included), we’re looking at a more diverse group — both men and women, different races and nationalities, etc. Even more importantly, I wanted to take a look at some of the world’s recent and distant serial killers with some of the most disturbing motives or stories. Keep in mind…. I’m not claiming these are THE most disturbing serial killers. There have been too many for me to ever know about them all, and that would be subjective. These are just some examples of particularly disturbing individuals that caught my attention or made me cringe.
This study compared the effects of a constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach (CMA) and of a traditional teaching approach (TTA) on (a) the quality and. That was one hell of an episode of Game of Thrones. So much fire. And even more ice! Let’s try to wrap our heads around everything that happened—if you’ve.
If other serial killers top your own personal list, feel free to leave a comment below to tell us about them. Disturbing Serial Killers from Around the World.
IPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch Secrets https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUz8ngGbWuU. CDV-715 Retro Digital Geiger Counter page 1: CDV-715 Retro Digital Geiger Counter page 2: CDV-715 Retro Digital Geiger Counter page 3: CDV-715 Retro Digital Geiger. InformationWeek.com: News, analysis and research for business technology professionals, plus peer-to-peer knowledge sharing. Engage with our community. Below is a copy of the README.TXT file that was included with PC shareware Doom version 1.8. This edition of README.TXT includes a large amount of information that is.
The serial killers profiled below are listed in alphabetical order (by first names) — not in any order based on how “disturbing” I might find them, by race, nationality, etc. Also, understand that the definition of “serial killer” is heavily debated. For example some definitions simply state there must be a break between killings to separate serial killers from mass- murderers. Other definitions give a specific length that break must be in order to qualify as a serial killer rather than a spree killer. We’re not going split hairs about that here.
Note: Where legal images were available for re- publication, I’ve included them below. You can run a Google image search to view other serial killers from the list if you’re interested — but having them appear in image search results doesn’t give us the right to publish them here for you directly. I did, however, try to link to one page with an image where possible when one wasn’t available for republication. Now, let’s get to the list. Ahmad Suradji[image]The idea of ritualistic serial killers on one hand baffles me and on the other hand fascinates me. They’re a reminder that the world is full of different cultures where different practices are considered acceptable than here in the West.
But Ahmad Suradji doesn’t seem to be following any kind of cultural norm. Instead he just sounds deranged. At the same time, I have to admit it’s one of the more “interesting” excuses or motives I’ve ever seen. Here’s more on Indonesian serial killer, Ahmad Suradji. Victims: Suradji murdered 4. The killings took place over 1.
Kill Zone: Medan, Indonesia. Methods: Suradji buried his victims up to their waists and strangled them with a cable. Motives: Suradji conducted ritual killings. He claimed to be told by his father’s ghost in a dream that by killing these women and drinking their saliva, he would become a mystic healer. Outcome: Ahmad Suradji was found guilty on April 2. July 1. 0, 2. 00. Additional Information: One of Suradji’s three wives (Tumini) was tried as an accomplice.
Often Suradji’s victims were women who came to him seeking his services as a healer. Aileen Wuornos. Credit: Robot Nine via Picasa Web Albums. On one hand, I can understand that traumatic experiences can lead to disturbing behavior. Still…. Call me crazy, but I just can’t see trauma caused by someone else as justification for murdering others. Then again, that’s probably because I’m not crazy. Aileen Wuornos is the first female serial killer on our list here, and she’s an example of someone who was (or who claimed to be) traumatized, leading to the murders of several men. Victims: Wuornos killed 7 men between the ages of 4.
Kill Zone: Florida, United States. Methods: The murders were committed with multiple gun shots. Motives: Wuornosclaimed that the men she killed had raped her (or tried to) while she was working as a prostitute. Outcome: Wuornos was executed by lethal injection on October 9, 2. Additional Information: Aileen Wuornos’ story was the basis for the movie Monster.
She had a child when she was a young teen, claiming she was raped by an unknown man. However, it’s suspected by some that her brother actually fathered the child. Alexander Pichushkin[image]Alexander Pichushkin is a Russian serial killer known as “The Chessboard Killer.” Unlike some killers who have almost understandable motives (such as being abused or tortured themselves in some way — not that it excuses anything), Pichushkin is a whole different level of crazy. He killed for the competition of it. Victims: Pichushkin has 4. While not all, most of them were elderly homeless men.
Kill Zone: Moscow, Russia. Methods: Most of Alexander Pichushkin’s victims were killed with hammer blows to the head.
He preferred to strike them from behind supposedly to avoid spilling blood on himself. He then threw some of his victims into the sewers. Motives: It is believed Pichushkin considered himself to be in competition with another serial killer — Andrei Chikatilo. At one point he mentioned that his “goal” was to kill 6.
Outcome: Pichushkin was convicted on October 2. Additional Information: Pichushkin has been quoted as saying “For me, life without killing is like life without food for you…. I felt like the father of all these people, since it was I who opened the door for them to another world.”He was kept in a glass cage during his trial. Andrei Chikatilo[images]You’ve already seen the name Andrei Chikatilo mentioned, because he was at least partially the inspiration for another Russian serial killer — Alexander Pichushkin. Chikatilo was known by two nicknames — “The Red Ripper” and “The Rostov Ripper.”Victims: Chikatilo killed 5. Kill Zone: Rostov Oblast, Russia.
Methods: Chikatilo didn’t kill all of his victims in the same way. Most were stabbed, but a few were strangled or battered to death.
All were mutilated. Motives: Chikatilo killed for sexual satisfaction — he could only become aroused by committing violent acts against women. Outcome: Andrei Chikatilo was shot and executed on February 1.
Additional Information: Chikatilo was impotent due to a childhood illness, yet had two children of his own. His son Yuri was charged with the attempted murder of a man. Carl Eugene Watts[image]One thing I find particularly disturbing is when killers start young and no one “notices” or stops them before they can escalate. According to Watts, he was one of those kinds of killers. Victims: Watts killed females between the ages of 1. Twelve victims are confirmed, but it’s expected that there were more — possibly dozens.
Kill Zone: Texas and Michigan, United States. Methods: Watts wasn’t faithful to any particular method of killing his victims. He use strangulation, stabbing, drowning, and beatings. Motives: While his motives aren’t believed to be sexual in nature (as with many serial killers), they aren’t known. Outcome: Watts died of cancer on September 2. Prior to this, he had been serving time in Texas. Additional Information: Watts is believed to have had an IQ of just 6.
Carlton Gary[image]I won’t say that I do or don’t believe Carlton Gary is guilty of being “The Stocking Strangler.” But for all that we know, that’s who he is. Others disagree, and believe it’s a case of poor evidence. What do you think?
Victims: Carlton Gary is believed to have killed 7 elderly women. Kill Zone: Georgia, United States.
How Will the Game of Thrones TV Show Affect the Books? Greetings from the future!
Welcome to “Postal Apocalypse,” io. Rob Bricken. This week I’ve got a lot of Defenders questions (from one curious reader), a lot more Game of Thrones questions (from many curious readers), and I explain why you should only be slightly worried about the Captain Marvel more right now. Book Learning. Sean P.
Stephenson: I’ve been following the HBO version of Go. T since the beginning, and have been toying with reading the books, but I had a multi- part question I feel only you can answer.
When Go. T concludes next year on HBO, do you think GRRM will incorporate any of the premises presented that have been shown on the small screen that he didn’t originally come up with, and do you think he will change anything he had already come up with because of what was already shown, as in “I thought that was a good idea, but having seen it played out, let’s go a different route.”It’s impossible to say. Sorry to defer the question, but George R. R. Martin is still writing The Winds of Winter, and has A Dream of Spring left to go (if not more—I still believe he’s going to end up writing three more books all told before he’s done). What he has planned today may change tomorrow, or next year, or the year after that. Or the year after that… or the year after that. You see where I’m going with this. At some point, GRRM, David Benioff, and D.
B. Weiss sat down to discuss the end of the story, both A Song of Ice and Fire and Game of Thrones. Blackberry Desktop Software Device Information Update Failed on this page. I sincerely doubt he told the showrunners everything he has planned, but there were definitely some story elements just too entrenched into the narrative for the show to skip, e. Hodor’s name. There may be a few others, but unless Weiss and Benioff ’fess up, we won’t know for sure until the books are out.
That said, the show will end up being vastly, vastly different from the books. Part of this is because the show has made its own changes to the narrative over its many years, which can’t help but affect the ending; part of it is because the series is ending in such a condensed timeframe (only this Sunday’s season finale and six more episodes to go!); and part of it is likely Benioff and Weiss’ respect for GRRM, and their desire not to trample on what he has in mind for the books’ ending. But mostly because the books have so many more elements at play than the TV series: the Fake Aegon, Lady Stoneheart, Victarion Greyjoy, Jeyne Poole (whom Ramsay Bolton marries and claims is Arya), and more. Maybe Martin has something planned that the show is doing that, after seeing it, he’ll change his mind about.
But we can’t possibly know until he writes it. The Defense Rests. Jess D.: Dear Postman, I have some Defenders questions. A lot of Defenders questions. Why is there the remains of a giant dragon underneath New York City?
How did the monks of Kun- lun get over to North America to build a door that only the Iron Fist could open? If the Substance was so dangerous, why not leave the door locked permanently? Or better yet why not destroy it? Why didn’t the Hand just dig around the door? There was a huge cavern down there.
Couldn’t they have dug to any other area and gotten in? Why would removing the Substance destroy NYC?
If the Hand wanted to get back to Kun- lun, like they said all the time, why did they only seem interested in getting to that underground place that we know wasn’t Kun- lun from Iron Fist? I can give you answers to all of these, as long as you don’t mind that The Defenders TV series in no way supports or confirms any of them. In ancient times giant dragons roamed the earth, and died like any other creature.
The monks tasked themselves with protecting the Substance left behind by these dragons to prevent evil people from getting ahold of it. They traveled by boats to North America, and then used their mystical powers both to push the bones deep, deep underground and to create a magic shield all the way around the cavern that now housed them, leaving a door as the only access point. The monks did this instead of destroying the Substance, because they could foresee a time when they were so desperate they might need the Substance themselves, and thus made the key the Iron Fist, who would always be a protector of K’un- Lun… until Danny Rand fucked it up. Oh, and then the mystical energies of these dragons subconsciously led humans to build cities on top of them. Although, the Hand clearly got to the Substance under Pompeii and Chernobyl, because they said they destroyed them… hmm… the dragon under New York City was the biggest dragon and had the most substance, which made it the one that most needed to be denied to the Hand, and is why New York City is a much, much more major city than Chernobyl or Pompeii. More dragon, more mystical energy, more Substance, more city.
And after so many millennia, the Substance became part of the essence of the Earth itself—mystically—and thus removing would effectively cause a cataclysm in the location it was housed. As for your last question, it’s because… uh… by sealing the area off, the Monks effectively made it part of K’un- Lun, even though it was thousands of miles from the actual mystical city.
So Sigourney Weaver and the rest were speaking metaphorically. Yeah. The Jon Con.
W: I feel there hasn’t been enough discussion about the legitimate reveal that Jon is in fact the legitimate son of Rhaegar and the entire dynamic this imposes on Jon- Dany hook up believers. He is in the direct succession to the iron throne.
I honestly cannot see how these two would work if this gets exposed to the whole world. Even if it is after she may or may not get pregnant with a mini incest royalty baby, I cannot visualize a way for the plot to just make this situation okay with Jon. I can realistically see Dany dying after all this simply because Jon will in fact always know nothing. Dany cannot possible just stop her quest for total dominance of Westeros just because Jon gets revealed to be the true heir (at least let’s hope the show writers don’t take the easy way out). It’s not going to get exposed to the whole world. When Jon finds out—if Jon finds out, he could probably fulfill whatever prophecy Rhaegar heard that made him seek out Lyanna Stark and marry her and throw all of Westeros into civil war without ever knowing—he’s not going to broadcast it.
He’ll likely tell Dany, who also won’t tell anybody, for obvious reasons. And Jon will be fine with that, because there is no one who wants to sit on the Iron Throne less than Jon Snow. Also Jon is absolutely not going to live through the series finale. The Lord of Light brought him back for a purpose; when that purpose is fulfilled, he isn’t going to be rewarded with a vacation.
That’s not how the world of Westeros works. The End Is Not Nigh. James M.: Game of Thrones has already surpassed its source material and will possibly finish the entire saga before we even get the penultimate volume in book form. Kingkiller Chronicles is already spinning off televison, movies and video games while we await the concluding volume with bated breath. Stormlight Archive has been greenlit for movie adaptions and realistically the series will not conclude for another 2. We have so many wonderful finished works that remain unadapted.
Why are we rushing so much to make film and television of works in progress? Because TV and movie studios need to make money constantly, and to do that they need to make content. They look for what’s hot right now, not what’s finished. That’s a problem for later, and it’s for the creators and directors and screenwriters and so forth—not the studios. This is true just about anywhere, to be clear. Anime does this a fair amount. Fullmetal Alchemist is the biggest example I can think of—it had a TV show long before the manga was finished, and then just made up its own ending, just like Game of Thrones.