Congress Isnt Happy About the Equifax Breach. We knew it wouldnt be long before Congress demanded action in response to the Equifax data breachparticularly since several of its members are among the 1. Americans who are pissed about having their Social Security numbers and other personal data exposed. Equifax announced the breach yesterday, and so far the companys behavior has been an example of how not to respond to a data breach. The tool for consumers to check if their data was stolen doesnt really work, Equifax is supposedly offering free credit monitoring but no one can sign up yet, and several of its executives mysteriously sold off stock before the breach was announced. I/51P84188A4L._SL500_AC_SS350_.jpg' alt='Canon Eos Digital Solutions Disk Iso Software Download' title='Canon Eos Digital Solutions Disk Iso Software Download' />In short, its a disasterand lawmakers arent happy. Among those taking action, three Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee didnt waste any time on Friday digging into the companys questionable response. In a letter Friday, US Representatives Frank Pallone, Jr., Diana De. Gette, and Jan Schakowsky tasked the Government Accountability Office GAO with evaluating whether Equifaxs reaction to the breach will in any way benefit the millions of Americans now at risk of financial fraud. After all, Equifax is itself a credit reporting agency theres plenty of irony to go around. Specifically, the lawmakers say theyre alarmed by GEO reports that suggest simply offering to monitor a breach victims credit is not the way to go. The entire purpose of offering this service, according to GAOs findings, is to avoid liability while offering consumers peace of mind. After the Office of Personnel Management OPM was breached in 2. However, the GAO later found that this decision was not based on any actual analysis of whether or not the services were truly effective, the lawmakers said. While putting peoples minds at ease is certainly a service, its hardly a substitute for a genuine shield against identity theft. Simply compensating consumers whose data has been hacked with a year of monitoring is not going to be enough. Questions remain about whether purchasing and providing credit monitoring for customers is the optimal way to respond to data breaches, the lawmakers wrote. In particular, we are concerned that the popular response may reflect factors unrelated to the actual protection of breach victims and reliance on these products after the breach may result in consumers being lulled into a false sense of security. The Democrats have asked the GAO to take another swing at determining precisely what post breach solutions would benefit victims of data theftand not just those impacted by Equifax. The lawmakers would like to know, for instance, as do we all,To what extent does the most effective solution vary by breach type, victim characteristics, demographics or other key factors Theyve also asked To what extent are the services offered determined by price and To what extent are they determined by their level of protectionThis incident shows how urgent the need is to find better ways to protect personal data, Rep. Diana De. Gette, the ranking member on the House subcommittee on oversight and investigations, told Gizmodo. Clearly, as a country we need to craft new means to keep thieves and hackers from obtaining and using personal information. Studio Monitor. In the studio the 19 Sumo becomes an affordable yet incredibly powerful HDR monitor. With 10 stops dynamic range, 10bit processing and XRite. Simply compensating consumers whose data has been hacked with a year of monitoring is not going to be enough. Should the GAO identify effective post breach solutions and obstacles that impede their use, De. Gette and her colleagues have also asked for new recommendations on how both the federal government and the private sector can more widely leverage these solutions to the benefit of data breach victims. Its difficult to assess whether Equifaxs offer will actually help anyone. Despite its lengthy press release, the company has revealed next to nothing about the breach and the types of data stolenbeyond saying as many as 1. The company didnt disclose the breach for more than a month after detecting it, a decision which has drawn significant criticism. And the nature of the website application vulnerability supposedly responsible for the breach itself also remains unclear. The ambiguity with which the company has described the incidentthey have referred to it as a cybersecurity incident and an intrusioncould indicate that a hacker, or hackers, went to painstaking lengths to steal its customer database. One would presume they intend to use it. But for all we know now, the company mightve simply left the door wide open, its databases made accessible through some serious lapse in security to virtually anyone with a web browser and the right IP address. Images/News/2014/Digital-Photo-Professional-4-Splash-Screen.jpg' alt='Canon Eos Digital Solutions Disk Iso Software Download' title='Canon Eos Digital Solutions Disk Iso Software Download' />What can be weighed, however, is Equifaxs response after learning about the breach Is the company doing everything it can to do right by its customers Or is it acting solely in its own self interest, taking only the steps necessary to reduce its own liability So far, the outlook is not great. Offering to monitor the victims credit is the very definition of the least Equifax could do. It is a threat to our economic security. But now there are other concerns Troubling language has been discovered on the website Equifax set up to allow its customers to check to see if their personal information was exposed. Few whove signed up likely noticed the arbitration clause in the terms of service that restricts them from participating in any class action lawsuits arising from the incident. Seriously, this is a thing. The GAO evaluation is only one of several investigative measures being pushed by members of Congress. It is a threat to our economic security, Sen. List of well known, registered, and dynamicprivate ports. Im using a compact point and shoot digital camera and i would like to ask it is worth it to upgrade to a DSLR camera How huge a difference do DSLR cameras make. History. Metadata was traditionally used in the card catalogs of libraries until the 1980s, when libraries converted their catalog data to digital databases. Secure Digital SD is a nonvolatile memory card format developed by the SD Card Association SDA for use in portable devices. The standard was introduced in August. For those not entirely up on the highend camera scene these days, heres a quick catchup. In an arena that has been dominated by Canon and Nikon since pretty much. Access 2007 Dlookup Update Query Example there. List of USB IDs Maintained by Stephen J. Gowdy If you have any new entries, please submit them via http or send. Designed for small and medium workgroups or enterprises, the imageRUNNER ADVANCE C3320 brings along a range of new features designed to improve productivity, security. Need any more convincing Try for yourself, on your own computer, with your own files Click Here To Download Our Free 15Day Trial Edition No questions asked. Magic tricks, or illusions, make us go ooh, ahhh, and how the flippin crap did they do that Theyre part sleight of hand, part planning, and. Mark Warner tweeted. He floated several ideas for legislation to address cybersecurity nightmares like the Equifax breach, including notification standards for companies to tell consumers about hacks. It doesnt look like Energy and Commerce is going to be the only committee trying to get answers from Equifax, either. Rep. Ted Lieu is calling for the House Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on the breach. Lieu wants Equifax to testify, of course, but he wants their major competitorsExperian and Trans. Unionto come to the table, too. Each company, he said, should be required to explain how it is taking proactive, defensive steps to prevent such breaches in the future. On top of the investigative hearings, some members of Congress are already pushing for legislation that would create stricter regulation of credit reporting agencies. Sen. Brian Schatz announced that he plans to reintroduce legislation he drafted in 2. Gizmodo reached out to Equifax with a list of questions about the data breach Thursday afternoon. No one from company has responded so far, but well update when and if they do. Update, 8 0. 0pm As a helpful reader pointed out below, Equifax has added language to a Q A section on its website addressing the arbitration clause issue The arbitration clause and class action wavier included in the Trusted. ID Premier Terms of Use applies to the free credit file monitoring and identity theft protection products, and not the cybersecurity incident. Should You Buy a DSLR or Point and Shoot Digital Camera A Post By Darren RowseIm using a compact point and shoot digital camera and i would like to ask it is worth it to upgrade to a DSLR camera How huge a difference do DSLR cameras make compared to compact point and shoot digital cameraThanks for the question Ill attempt to keep my answer brief and not too technical. This is a question that Im regularly asked, increasingly so as the price of DSLRs have dropped and become much more in the reach of the average digital photographers budget. Before I start this post you might like to check out two posts looking at the Top DSLR Models and Top Point and Shoot Cameras as voted by our readers. Let me declare up front that I own both a Point and Shoot digital camera a Fujifilm Fine. Pix F3. 0 and a DSLR a Canon EOS 5. D. I like having both because I do feel they compliment each other and are each suited for different situations. My preference in terms of quality of shots is with the DSLR but for convenience the point and shoot sometimes wins out. I also want to say up front that the digital camera industry is constantly evolving and changing. The lines between DSLRs and point and shoots are blurring or at least this seems to be the intention of manufacturers. What I write below unfortunately will have elements of generalizations in it as I classify hundreds of cameras each with their own distinctive features into two camps. Are Megapixels Everything Before I get into the Pros and Cons of DSLRs vs Point and Shoot digital cameras I want to address a common misconception that I regularly hear among digital camera owners that a cameras megapixel rating is the main thing to consider when determining a cameras quality. The fact is that megapixels are NOT everything. Despite point and shoot cameras now coming with up to 1. Casio released one last month their quality level is not necessarily has good as a DSLR with only 8 or so. The main reason for this and there are many as well see below is that the image sensor used in point and shoot digital cameras is generally much smaller than the image sensor used in a DSLR the difference is often as much as 2. This means that the pixels on a point and shoot camera have to be much smaller and without getting too technical collect fewer photons ok I lied about the technicalities. The long and short of it is that because of this point and shoot cameras need to work at slower ISO levels which means that they produce noisier or more grainy shots. A lot more could be said on sensor size but trust me, smaller sensors significantly reduce the quality of an image. Id much rather have a camera with less megapixels and a larger image sensor than the other way around. This is one factor that needs to be considered when choosing between a DSLR and point and shoot but let me run through some more DSLRs. A quick definition unfortunately some camera manufacturers in recent months have released cameras with the DSLR label that technically are not. For the purposes of this article Ill define DSLRs as cameras that have removable lenses, that have a reflex mirror which allows live optical viewing through the lens taking the image. DSLRs use a mirror that allows you to see the image youre about to shoot through the view finder when you take the shot the mirror flips up allowing the image sensor to capture the image. Some cameras these days are being touted as DSLRs because you have through lens viewing but they are not true DSLRs Digital, Single, Lens, Reflex. This does not necessarily make them a bad camera but in my opinion it there is a distinction between them. DSLR Strengths. Image Quality Ive already covered this above in my discussion on megapixels and image sensors but due to the larger size of image sensors in DSLRs which allows for larger pixel sizes DSLRs are generally able to be used at a faster ISO which will lead to faster shutter speeds and less grain. Adaptability DSLRs ability to change lenses opens up a world of possibilities for photographers. While my point and shoot has a nice little 3x Optical Zoom and many these days have longer ones my DSLR can be fitted with many high quality lenses ranging from wide angle to super long focal lengths depending upon what Im photographing and of course my budget. Add to this a large range of other accessories flashes, filters etc and a DSLR can be adapted to many different situations. It should be noted that when it comes to lenses that the diversity in quality of lenses is great. Image quality is impacted greatly by the quality of the lens you use. Speed DSLRs are generally pretty fast pieces of machinery when it comes to things like start up, focussing and shutter lag. Optical Viewfinder due to the reflex mirror DSLRs are very much a what you see is what you get operation. ISO range this varies between cameras but generally DSLRs offer a wide array of ISO settings which lends itself to their flexibility in shooting in different conditions. Manual Controls while many point and shoots come with the ability to shoot in manual mode, a DSLR is designed in such a way that it is assumed that the photographer using it will want to control their own settings. While they do come with good auto modes the manual controls are generally built in in such a way that they are at the photographers finger tips as they are shooting. Hold its value some argue that a DSLR will hold its value longer than a point and shoot. There is probably some truth in this. DSLR models do not get updated quite as often as point and shoot models which can be updated twice a year at times. The other factor in favor of DSLRs is that the lenses you buy for them are compatible with other camera bodies if you do choose to upgrade later on as long as you stay with your brand. This means your investment in lenses is not a waste over the years. Depth of Field one of the things I love about my DSLR is the versatility that it gives me in many areas, especially depth of field. I guess this is really an extension of its manual controls and ability to use a variety of lenses but a DSLR can give you depth of field that puts everything from forground to background in focus through to nice blurry backgrounds. Quality Optics I hesitate to add this point as there is a large degree of difference in quality between DSLR lenses and point and shoot cameras are always improving but in general the lenses that youll find on a DSLR are superior to a point and shoot camera. DSLR lenses are larger more glass can add to the quality and many of them have many hours of time put into their manufacture especially when you get into higher end lenses. I strongly advise DSLR buyers to buy the best quality lenses that they can afford. It its the difference between a high end lens on a medium range camera or a medium range lens on a high end camera Id go for quality lenses every time as they add so much to photos. DSLR Weaknesses. Price while they are coming down in price especially at the lower end DSLRs are generally more expensive than point and shoot digital cameras. Also consider that you might want to upgrade your lens as kit lenses are generally not of a super high quality or you may wish to add more lenses later and that this adds to the cost of a DSLR.