Prime Minister Says the Laws of Australia Can Beat the Laws of Math. Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has been threatening to pass a law to effectively end the use of secure encryption in Australia for a while now. On Friday, he made his intentions more concrete and said that legislation mandating a government back door of some type will be introduced before the end of the year. This is bad for everyone. After the horrifying terror attack in London last week, the familiar debate over government accessRead more Read. Public debate around the governments ability to access encrypted files exploded in 2. Apple fought the US government over its requests to unlock a terrorists i. Looking for online definition of ABC or what ABC stands for ABC is listed in the Worlds largest and most authoritative dictionary database of abbreviations and acronyms. Get the latest news and analysis in the stock market today, including national and world stock market news, business news, financial news and more. Free Download ABC Amber Text Converter 5. Document converter with support for conversion between many file formats. Poladroid software is the easiest and funniest Polaroid Image Maker for MAC, Windows and more. From your digital photos, create vintage pictures and full of. Phone. A wider audience than ever before received an education in the fundamental principles of encryption and the fact that it loses its security value if anyone has a key to decrypt the files. It appears that Prime Minister Turnbull does not understand this principle. On Friday, the Australian government revealed details about its plans the require tech companies to offer access to encrypted files. Turnbulls comments about the law betray his willful ignorance on the issue. The laws of Australia prevail in Australia, I can assure you of that, Turnbull said. The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia. Please let that sink in. The laws of math are commendable. Turnbull is very bluntly saying that Australia simply wont have end to end encryption. The laws of math dont change just because Australia wants them to. A back door is typically a flaw in a software program that perhaps the you know, the developer of the software program is not aware of and that somebody who knows about it can exploit, Turnbull said, before he demonstrated that those are just words in his head of which he has no understanding. Brandis told ABC, Last Wednesday I met with the chief cryptographer at GCHQ, the Government Communication Headquarters in the United Kingdom. XNXX delivers free sex movies and fast free porn videos tube porn. Now 10 million sex vids available for free Featuring hot pussy, sexy girls in xxx rated porn clips. Abc Amber Blackberry Converter Software' title='Abc Amber Blackberry Converter Software' />Were talking about lawful access. Lawful access is simply a back door. Australian Attorney General George Brandis told ABC on Friday that what the government is seeking is something along the same lines as the UKs Investigatory Powers Act. While that legislation has its own issues, it only requires communications service providers that are based in the UK to have an ability to access encrypted files at the governments request. How To Update My Custom Firmware On My Psp Score. It exempts foreign companies from the rule. Brandis told ABC, Last Wednesday I met with the chief cryptographer at GCHQ, the Government Communication Headquarters in the United Kingdom. And he assured me that this was feasible. As Tech. Dirt points out, Brandis is likely confused about the conversation he had. On July 1. 0th, the former head of GHCQ, Robert Hannigan said that back doors shouldnt be implemented and intelligence agencies should focus on attacking the end points of encryption, a practice that has been used for some time. It seems that Brandis probably heard that it was feasible to attack end points without disrupting the security of end to end encryption. Anthony Albanese, leader of the opposition to Turnbulls government made no promises about how the legislation would be received, saying that lawmakers would take a common sense approach that we must keep Australians safe. Weakening encryption for global tech companies would make everyone, not just Australians, less safe. As Elaine Pearson, Australia director at Human Rights Watch, put it in a statement The government needs to accept that it wont know what everybody is doing all of the time. We dont outlaw whispering or drawing the blinds for privacy. In the same way, we should accept encryption is the only way to safeguard our communications in an era of cybercrime and unauthorised surveillance. BBC, ABC, Tech. Another Great App Went Subscription Only and Everything Is Terrible. I blame Adobe for this. Ulysses, one of the best writing tools available right now, is going subscription only. If you previously purchased Ulysses for Mac or i. OS it works seamlessly across Macs, i. Phones, and i. Pads you are now going to have to pony up 5 a month or 4. And again, I blame Adobe for this, because it taught software developers that they can put their clients over a barrelroyally screwing early adopters by having them pay repeatedly for product. Back in 2. 01. 3 Adobe moved its most valuable software, including Photoshop, Illustrator, and Premiere, to a subscription only model. If you want to use the industry standard software Adobe creates you have to throw down 1. Its been a sore point for many a computer user who still remembers the halcyon days when purchasing software meant you, essentially, owned it. Since then many apps have moved to this new modeloften promising cool updates as a reward for being a subscriber. Quicken, Autodesk, Adobe, and even more niche companies now like Ulysses, are moving towards this model and theres no sign of them stopping any time soon. Ulysses is developed by a small publisher called Soulmen, and its co founder, Max Seelman, took to Medium on Friday to defend his companys decision. Our users expect a continuously evolving high quality product  and subscription is the only way we can truly deliver on that expectation, he said in his post. Seelman went on to explain how software development has shifted dramatically since Soulmen first launched Ulysses. Software purchases used to be very different from how they are today. Until not too long ago, you would purchase an application and get a physical copy on a bunch of floppies or later a CD. The thing you got  that was it. No patches, no updates. Developers had to put forward an extreme amount of attention to get everything right, because once an app was out, development had to be done. Seelman then noted that software development changed as internet speeds improved. With companies able to produce patches that not only resolved minor issues at launch, but also introduced new features. At first, these resulted in new features being added on the fly, but it quickly evolved into issuing more and more substantial patches  until today, where most v. Essentially, Seelman argues, software is now in constant development and pricing hasnt kept up with this new cycle. Which, okay, it makes sense If software is constantly getting features that normally would have warranted a new version and additional money than the company absolutely has the right to ask for more cash. The company is offering, for a limited time, a discount to older users, and if those user happened to purchase the software within the last year than theyll also received up to 1. Soulmen has also made it clear that the old version of the app available in the i. OS and Mac app stores will be available for use and updated to work with i. OS 1. 1 and High Sierra. After that youre out of luck. Whats frustrating about this is how shifting to these new forms of payment are great for the developer and fine for new users, but suck, a lot, for old users. I know, because Ive been using Ulysses for the better part of six years. Its a piece of software Im so attached to Ive name checked it when people ask why I dont switch to Windows or Android for my daily work machines. The announcement of a move to subscription based payment popped up as soon as I opened the app on my computer this morning and, annoyed, I took to Twitter to bask in the irritation of other users. Ulysses isnt going to be the last app forced to make this decision. As consumers demand more and more from minor updates software developers will need to find a way to make profit. They can try to tightly manage their business and continue with the old model, demanding money only when a new and truly outstanding feature appears, or they can go the Ulysses route, which many companies, including Adobe, have done before. Its proven effective, even as subscription fees balloon on users credit cards and leave them irritated and underwhelmed. Adobe, Autodesk and Quicken are all huge and required apps for their respective industries. They can afford to ask for money each month, but if Ulysses doesnt provide cool new features with every update, that 4. Scrivener or some other non subscription based writing app. At the very least Ulysses could have taken a note from the book of Plex. That software suite went from completely free to a subscription based model and users were. So Plex offered a lifetime membership. Essentially you pay out the nose once and never pay again. As someone who uses the app every day that was a no brainer for me. I dropped my wad of cash and never looked back, and I didnt have to look at yet another subscription fee on my credit card statement either. Just a thought Ulysses.